Comparison of a micro-multileaf collimator with a 5-mm-leaf-width collimator for intracranial stereotactic radiotherapy.
Monk JE, Perks JR, Doughty D, Plowman PN.
Radiotherapy Department, St. Bartholomew's Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it
PURPOSE: To dosimetrically compare a micro-multileaf collimator (minimum leaf width of 3 mm) with the 5-mm-leaf multileaf collimator (MLC) of a standard linear accelerator for stereotactic conformal radiotherapy treatment of intracranial lesions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fourteen patients previously treated for a variety of irregularly shaped intracranial lesions using BrainLAB's micro-MLC were retrospectively replanned using the Varian Millennium MLC (5 mm leaf width). All planning was performed with the BrainSCAN v 5.1 software. The same fixed, noncoplanar beam arrangement was used for both plans, and identical target coverage was achieved by adjusting the MLC shape around the planning target volume (PTV). The isodose distributions and dose-volume histograms (DVH) were computed and plans were compared in terms of conformity of the prescription isodose to the PTV and dose received by surrounding normal tissue. RESULTS: Equivalent PTV coverage was achieved using the 5-mm collimator by adjusting the MLC shape around the target in every case. There was a statistically significant increase in the conformity index for the Varian MLC compared with the micro-MLC (p < 0.001), indicating a worse conformity of the prescription isodose to the PTV, but this parameter was within our (and Radiation Therapy Oncology Group) clinical criterion in all cases. There was no statistically significant difference in the maximum dose to critical structures, but DVH curves demonstrated an increased volume of normal tissue irradiated to the lower isodose levels. The mean increase in the volume of critical structure enclosed within the 50% and 70% isodose surfaces was 5.7% and 4.9%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The micro-MLC consistently improves both PTV conformity and surrounding tissue sparing when compared to that of a standard linear accelerator. However, when viewed quantitatively, the improvements are small enough that individual centers may question their choice of equipment when outfitting a stereotactic radiotherapy service.
PMID: 14630284 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
-
-
Intensity-modulated stereotactic radiotherapy vs. stereotactic conformal radiotherapy for the treatment of meningioma located predominantly in the skull base.
Baumert BG, Norton IA, Davis JB.
Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it
PURPOSE: This study evaluates a possible advantage of intensity-modulated stereotactic radiotherapy (IMSRT) over stereotactic conformal radiotherapy (SCRT) in the treatment of lesions in the base of the skull. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Ten patients (7 with a skull base meningioma) planned for routine SCRT were replanned for IMSRT. The criteria for comparison were the same for both methods: optimal dose to the planning target volume (PTV) and optimal sparing of the organs at risk (OAR). For SCRT, sparing of OAR was achieved by conformal avoidance using 5-6 fields. The IMSRT inverse planning process used optimized OAR sparing through user-defined dose constraints. Dose to the PTV and OAR were assessed by dose-volume histograms, maximum dose, 2 conformity indices, and volumes of relevant isodoses. RESULTS: The conformity index is consistently higher for IMSRT, the largest improvement being for the multifocal and irregular cases. Volumes of the 90% and 80% isodoses were smaller for IMSRT, whereas the volume of the 30% isodose was larger for IMSRT in 6 cases. The maximum dose was consistently higher for IMSRT (mean values 102% and 108% for SCRT and IMSRT, respectively). Sparing of OAR was better with IMSRT, especially for those OARs situated in or near a concave PTV. CONCLUSIONS: In terms of PTV coverage, there is an advantage in using IMSRT for all target shapes, but especially for irregular and concave targets. The dose to OAR is lower with IMSRT, although the volume of normal tissue receiving a low dose can be larger than for SCRT.
Publication Types:
PMID: 12957272 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
-
-
Comparison of intensity-modulated radiosurgery with gamma knife radiosurgery for challenging skull base lesions.
Nakamura JL, Pirzkall A, Carol MP, Xia P, Smith V, Wara WM, Petti PL, Verhey LJ, Sneed PK.
Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, School of Medicine, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA.
PURPOSE: To quantitatively compare intensity-modulated radiosurgery (IMRS) using 3-mm mini-multileaf collimation with gamma knife radiosurgery (GKRS) plans for irregularly shaped skull base lesions in direct proximity to organs at risk (OAR).METHODS AND MATERIALS: Ten challenging skull base lesions originally treated with GKRS were selected for comparison with IMRS using inverse treatment planning and 3-mm mini-multileaf collimation operating in step-and-shoot delivery mode. The lesions ranged in volume from 1.6 to 32.2 cm(3) and were treated with 9-20 GK isocenters (mean 13.2). The IMRS plans were designed with the intent to, at minimum, match the GKRS plans with regard to OAR sparing and target coverage. For each case, IMRS plans were generated using 9 coplanar, 11 equally spaced noncoplanar, and 11 OAR-avoidant noncoplanar beams; the best of these approaches with respect to target conformality, sparing of OAR, and maintaining coverage was selected for comparison with the original GKRS plan.RESULTS: Assuming no patient motion or setup error, IMRS provided comparable target coverage and sparing of OAR and an improved conformity index at the prescription isodose contour but sometimes less conformity at lower isodose contours compared with the actual GKRS plan. All IMRS plans produced less target dose heterogeneity and shorter estimated treatment times compared with the GKRS plans.CONCLUSION: Compared with GKRS for complex skull base lesions, IMRS plans using a 3-mm mini-multileaf collimator achieved comparable or sometimes improved target coverage, conformity, and critical structure sparing with shorter estimated treatment times.
PMID: 12504041 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
-
-
Study on dosimetric parameters for stereotactic radiosurgery and intensity-modulated radiotherapy.
Sankaranarayanan V, Ganesan S, Oommen S, Padmanaban TK, Stumpf J, Ayyangar KM.
Apollo Speciality Hospital, Chennai, India.
This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it
This study is an attempt to compare the dosimetric parameters of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) using patient data. Radiosurgery was delivered through circular tertiary collimators attached to a linear accelerator. Six patients who were treated with SRS were replanned and evaluated with the IMRT planning system. Contouring of all structures, including target volume, was done on the IMRT system to closely match the SRS system. Treatment plans were generated after specifying the goals in the prescription module. The NOMOS BEAK collimator attached to the NOMOS MIMiC delivery device was chosen for treatment delivery. Various parameters such as conformity index, homogeneity index, target volume coverage, nontarget tissue, and brainstem doses were calculated and compared between the IMRT and SRS systems. Patient data were divided into 2 groups based on the complexity of the lesion and the number of isocenters used for radiosurgery. Analysis was done for each group and for the cumulative data. Superior conformality and homogeneous dose distribution in IMRT for multiple isocenter cases were observed. In addition, critical structure volumes for 50%, 70%, and 90% of the prescribed dose were lower in IMRT compared to SRS treatment. However, nontarget tissue received significantly higher doses with IMRT plans. Results show that IMRT treatment modality produces similar results as radiosurgery for small, spherical lesions, whereas it is found to be superior to SRS for irregular lesions in terms of critical structure sparing and better dose homogeneity.
Publication Types:
PMID: 12804705 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
-
-
Conformal radiotherapy optimization with micromultileaf collimators: comparison with radiosurgery techniques.
Kulik C, Caudrelier JM, Vermandel M, Castelain B, Maouche S, Rousseau J.
Laboratoire de Biophysique, ITM, CHRU, Lille, France.
PURPOSE: Conformal radiotherapy (CRT) consists of irradiating the target volume while avoiding the healthy peripheral tissues and organs at risk as far as possible. One technique used to treat intracranial tumors consists of using micromultileaf collimators (MMLCs). Given the dose constraints involved, it is of interest to optimize MMLC irradiation parameters and compare the results of this technique with those of conventional radiosurgery (RT) techniques (Gamma Knife and linear accelerator stereotactic RT). METHODS AND MATERIALS: MMLC protocols are optimized in two stages. The orientation of the fields, delimited by a beam's eye view technique, is determined using a genetic algorithm method. The weighting of the fields and subfields when using intensity modulation and the position of the leaves are optimized using a simulated annealing method. We compared the results obtained for 8 clinical cases using 5 intensity-modulated fields with those obtained using the two radiosurgery techniques. The comparison indexes are those defined by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG). RESULTS: The results of this study demonstrated the advantages of using intensity modulation and the improvement obtained for the RTOG indexes in the case of CRT with MMLC, although the healthy peripheral tissues were less exposed to radiation with the radiosurgery techniques. The results also highlight the difficulty encountered with radiosurgery techniques in obtaining satisfactory dose homogeneity when the protocol is defined with numerous iosocenters. CONCLUSION: In CRT with MMLC, intensity modulation makes it possible to reduce the number of fields used. It is especially useful to optimize the orientations in the case of target volumes of complex shape or when volumes at risk are in the vicinity of the target. If used correctly, MMLC can be a valuable alternative to conventional radiosurgery techniques.
PMID: 12095573 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
-
-
High precision focused irradiation in the form of fractionated stereotactic conformal radiotherapy (SCRT) for benign meningiomas predominantly in the skull base location.
Jalali R, Loughrey C, Baumert B, Perks J, Warrington AP, Traish D, Ashley S, Brada M.
Neuro-Oncology Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, The Royal Marsden NHS Trust, London, UK.
OBJECTIVE: To present early clinical results of stereotactic conformal radiotherapy (SCRT) in patients with benign predominantly skull base meningiomas. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Between August 1994 and August 1999, 41 patients with benign residual or recurrent meningiomas were treated with SCRT. Thirty-three were histologically verified. All patients were immobilized in a GTC stereotactic relocatable frame, and underwent a post-contrast CT localization scan with additional MRI for fusion in 15 patients. Treatment was delivered on a 6 MV linear accelerator using three (12 patients), or 4 (29 patients) non-coplanar conformal fixed fields to doses of 50-55 Gy in 30-33 daily fractions. Tumours were relatively large with a median gross tumour volume (GTV) of 17.9 cm3 (range 2.5-183 cm3). RESULTS: At a median follow-up of 21 months (range 6-62 months) none of 41 patients have recurred. The current imaging tumour control rate is 100% at 1 and 3 years. The actuarial survival at 2 years is 100% and 91% at 3 and 5 years. Following SCRT tumour decreased in size in 9 patients. SCRT was well tolerated. Five patients had improvement in vision, and six patients improvement in cranial nerve function. Two patients whose planning target volume (PTV) included the sella developed hypopituitarism during and at 18 months after SCRT. One patient with pre-existing hydrocephalus due to pineal region meningioma developed cognitive impairment 7 months after treatment. One patient with involvement of the optic nerve had visual deterioration at 18 months. CONCLUSIONS: SCRT is a feasible high precision irradiation technique for residual and recurrent skull base meningiomas including both small and larger tumours with excellent early tumour control and low toxicity. Longer follow-up is necessary to demonstrate sustained tumour control and low morbidity of such high precision localized method of fractionated irradiation.
PMID: 12069116 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
-
-
A comparison of dose distributions of proton and photon beams in stereotactic conformal radiotherapy of brain lesions.
Baumert BG, Lomax AJ, Miltchev V, Davis JB.
Radiation-Oncology, University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland.
This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it
PURPOSE: Micromultileaf collimators (mMLC) have recently been introduced to conform photon beams in stereotactic irradiation of brain lesions. Proton beams and stereotactic conformal radiotherapy (SCRT) can be used to tailor the dose to nonspherical targets, as most tumors of the brain are irregularly shaped. Comparative planning of brain lesions using either proton or stereotactically guided photon beams was done to assess the institution's clinically available modality for three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: For the photon treatment, multiple stereotactically guided uniform intensity beams from a linear accelerator were used, each conformed to a projection of the planning target volume (PTV) by a mMLC. Proton beams were delivered from an isocentrically mounted gantry, using the spot-scanning technique and energy modulation. Seven patients were scanned in a stereotactic frame; target volumes and organs at risk (OAR) were delineated with the help of MR images. Four different lesions were selected: (1) concave, (2) ellipsoid isolated, (3) superficial and close to an organ at risk, and (4) irregular complex. Dose distributions in the PTV and critical structures were calculated using three-dimensional treatment-planning systems, followed by both a quantitative (by dose--volume histogram and conformity index) and qualitative (visual inspection) assessment of the plans. RESULTS: A high degree of conformation was achieved with a mMLC and stereotactic uniform intensity beams with comparable conformity indices to protons for 5 out of 7 plans, especially for superficial or spherical lesions. In the cases studied, the conformity index was better for protons than for photons for complex or concave lesions, or when the PTV was in the neighborhood of critical structures. CONCLUSION: The results for the cases studied, show that for simple geometries or for superficial lesions, there is no advantage in using protons. However, for complex PTV shapes, or when the PTV is in the vicinity of critical structures, protons seem to be potentially better than the fixed-field photon technique.
PMID: 11286852 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
-
-
Optimizing radiotherapy of orbital and paraorbital tumors: intensity-modulated X-ray beams vs. intensity-modulated proton beams.
Miralbell R, Cella L, Weber D, Lomax A.
Division de Radio-Oncologie, Hopitaux Universitaires, Geneve, Switzerland.
This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it
PURPOSE: This study presents a dosimetric optimization effort aiming to compare intensity-modulated (IM) X-rays and IM protons in 4 different orbital and paraorbital tumors. These are most challenging targets for standard radiotherapy due to their close relationship with the eyes and related structures. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A primary orbital lymphoma, an optic nerve meningioma, a sphenoidal ridge meningioma protruding into the orbit, and a pediatric parameningeal paraorbital rhabdomyosarcoma were selected for the purpose of this study. Planning target volumes (PTVs) and organs at risk (OAR) were defined in each patient CT data set for each tumor site. IM X-ray and IM proton three-dimensional treatment plans were implemented. The following total tumor doses were prescribed: 30 Gy for the orbital lymphoma, 54 Gy for both meningiomas, and 50.4 Gy for the rhabdomyosarcoma case. Dose-volume histograms (DVHs) were obtained for all targets and OAR with both treatment techniques. DVHs were used to predict normal tissue complication probabilities (NTCPs) for the OAR in the vicinity of the tumor. RESULTS: The PTV coverage was optimal and equally homogeneous with both IM X-rays and IM proton plans in the 4 tumor sites. DVHs for most OAR were better with IM proton beams especially in the low- to mid-dose range region. The integral nontarget dose was lower with IM protons in every case (factor ranging from 1.5 to 1.9). However, predicted NTCPs (for severe late effects) were equally low for both treatment techniques in every tumor site. CONCLUSION: Although IM proton plans optimally decreased the dose to the OAR in all tumor sites, both optimized X-ray and proton beams equally succeeded to reduce severe-toxicity prediction risks to less than 5% while optimally treating the PTV.
PMID: 10863085 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
-
-
A dosimetric comparison of fan-beam intensity modulated radiotherapy with Gamma Knife stereotactic radiosurgery for treating intermediate intracranial lesions.
Ma L, Xia P, Verhey LJ, Boyer AL.
Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore 21201, USA.
This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it
PURPOSE: To compare and evaluate treatment plans for the fan-beam intensity modulated radiotherapy and the Gamma Knife radiosurgery for treating medium-size intracranial lesions (range 4-25 cm3). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Treatment plans were developed for the Leksell Gamma Knife and a fan-beam inverse treatment planning system for intensity modulated radiotherapy. Treatment plan comparisons were carried out using dose-volume histogram (DVH), tissue-volume ratio (TVR), and maximum dose to the prescription dose (MDPD) ratio. The study was carried out for both simulated targets and clinical targets with irregular shapes and at different locations. RESULTS: The MDPD ratio was significantly greater for the Gamma Knife plans than for the fan-beam IMRT plans. The Gamma Knife plans produced equivalent TVR values to the fan-beam IMRT plans. Based on the DVH comparison, the fan-beam IMRT delivered significantly more dose to the normal brain tissue than the Gamma Knife. The results of the comparison were found to be insensitive to the target locations. CONCLUSION: The Gamma Knife is better than the fan-beam IMRT in sparing normal brain tissue while producing equivalent tumor dose conformity for treating medium-size intracranial lesions. However, the target dose homogeneity is significantly better for the fan-beam IMRT than for the Gamma Knife.
PMID: 10613329 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
-
-
Comparison of intensity-modulated tomotherapy with stereotactically guided conformal radiotherapy for brain tumors.
Khoo VS, Oldham M, Adams EJ, Bedford JL, Webb S, Brada M.
Neuro-oncology Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research and the Royal Marsden NHS Trust, Sutton, Surrey, United Kingdom.
PURPOSE: Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) offers the potential to more closely conform dose distributions to the target, and spare organs at risk (OAR). Its clinical value is still being defined. The present study aims to compare IMRT with stereotactically guided conformal radiotherapy (SCRT) for patients with medium size convex-shaped brain tumors. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Five patients planned with SCRT were replanned with the IMRT-tomotherapy method using the Peacock system (Nomos Corporation). The planning target volume (PTV) and relevant OAR were assessed, and compared relative to SCRT plans using dose statistics, dose-volume histograms (DVH), and the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) stereotactic radiosurgery criteria. RESULTS: The median and mean PTV were 78 cm3 and 85 cm3 respectively (range 62-119 cm3). The differences in PTV doses for the whole group (Peacock-SCRT +/-1 SD) were 2%+/-1.8 (minimum PTV), and 0.1%+/-1.9 (maximum PTV). The PTV homogeneity achieved by Peacock was 12.1%+/-1.7 compared to 13.9%+/-1.3 with SCRT. Using RTOG guidelines, Peacock plans provided acceptable PTV coverage for all 5/5 plans compared to minor coverage deviations in 4/5 SCRT plans; acceptable homogeneity index for both plans (Peacock = 1.1 vs. SCRT = 1.2); and comparable conformity index (1.4 each). As a consequence of the transaxial method of arc delivery, the optic nerves received mean and maximum doses that were 11.1 to 11.6%, and 10.3 to 15.2% higher respectively with Peacock plan. The maximum optic lens, and brainstem dose were 3.1 to 4.8% higher, and 0.6% lower respectively with Peacock plan. However, all doses remained below the tolerance threshold (5 Gy for lens, and 50 Gy for optic nerves) and were clinically acceptable. CONCLUSIONS: The Peacock method provided improved PTV coverage, albeit small, in this group of convex tumors. Although the OAR doses were higher using the Peacock plans, all doses remained within the clinically defined threshold and were clinically acceptable. Further improvements may be expected using other methods of IMRT planning that do not limit the treatment delivery to transaxial arcs. Each IMRT system needs to be individually assessed as the paradigm utilized may provide different outcomes.
PMID: 10487565 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
|
